Open HSI menu
Subscribe Login

Home / Articles and Press Releases / Article / Hearing Protectors

CATEGORIES

  • Latest Issue
  • Above The Neck Protection
  • Chemical Protection
  • Confined Space
  • Construction
  • Emergency Procedures
  • Energy, Oil and Mining Industries
  • Eye Protection
  • Fall Protection
  • Gas Detection
  • Hand Protection
  • Hazardous and Explosive Atmospheres
  • Health and Safety Awareness
  • Hearing Protection
  • Heat and Flame
  • Lighting and ATEX
  • Noise Monitoring
  • Personal Protective Equipment
  • Respiratory Protection
  • Safety Footwear
  • Safety Technology
  • Safety Training
  • Slips, Trips and Falls
  • Wellbeing at Work
  • Working at Height
  • Working Rights

MORE

  • Press Releases
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Magazines

COMPANY

  • About
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
Open HSI menu
Subscribe

Home / Articles and Press Releases / Article / Hearing Protectors

CATEGORIES

  • Latest Issue
  • Above The Neck Protection
  • Chemical Protection
  • Confined Space
  • Construction
  • Emergency Procedures
  • Energy, Oil and Mining Industries
  • Eye Protection
  • Fall Protection
  • Gas Detection
  • Hand Protection
  • Hazardous and Explosive Atmospheres
  • Health and Safety Awareness
  • Hearing Protection
  • Heat and Flame
  • Lighting and ATEX
  • Noise Monitoring
  • Personal Protective Equipment
  • Respiratory Protection
  • Safety Footwear
  • Safety Technology
  • Safety Training
  • Slips, Trips and Falls
  • Wellbeing at Work
  • Working at Height
  • Working Rights

MORE

  • Press Releases
  • Events
  • Videos
  • Webinars
  • Magazines

COMPANY

  • About
  • Advertising
  • Newsletter
  • Contact

CATEGORIES

  • Article
  • Press Release
  • Above The Neck Protection
  • Chemical Protection
  • Confined Space
  • Construction
  • Emergency Procedures
  • Energy, Oil and Mining Industries
  • Eye Protection
  • Fall Protection
  • Gas Detection
  • Hand Protection
  • Hazardous and Explosive Atmospheres
  • Health and Safety Awareness
  • Hearing Protection
  • Heat and Flame
  • Lighting and ATEX
  • Noise Monitoring
  • Personal Protective Equipment
  • Respiratory Protection
  • Safety Footwear
  • Safety Technology
  • Safety Training
  • Slips, Trips and Falls
  • Wellbeing at Work
  • White Papers
  • Working at Height
  • Working Rights

Article

Hearing Protectors

By Alain Mayer

| Read Bio

Published: October 04th, 2008

Share this article

The importance of the proper assessment of PPE characteristics

The test methods and the specifications developed to assess the performances of the PPE shall in particular be representative of:

  • The real risks that the PPE is intended to protect the user against
  • All foreseeable conditions of use, which can affect the efficiency and comfort of PPE

In practice the assessment in laboratory of the efficiency and comfort of PPE remains, in many cases, rather theoretical. As a matter of fact, the standardised test methods adopted and used as basis for this assessment are very often empirical and simplistic. This is often the way followed by standardisers to get repeatable, reproducible and not too expensive tests.

Consequently, PPE having satisfied all the tests in the laboratory can sometimes appear in real conditions of use, less efficient and comfortable than expected. These differences in appreciation can appear when the real qualities of the PPE are difficult to assess objectively in the laboratory. This applies to all PPE, when their performances are closely linked to the morphological characteristics of the end-users and to the difficulty to identify the constrains related to foreseeable conditions of use. This is the case for safety aspects, such as the air tightness of respiratory protective devices and the noise attenuation of hearing protectors. This is also the case for the assessment of characteristics like practicability, thermal comfort, impairment of sensory perception of PPE. To reduce these discrepancies as much as possible, it is always advisable to try to correlate the results obtained in the laboratory with the reality of the work place. This could be done by conducting assessments in real situations of use of PPE being worn by the operators while carrying out their normal tasks.

Many studies have been carried out in particular by Occupational Health & Safety Institutes, testing laboratories and universities around the world (BGIA, FIOH, INRS, INSHT, CIOP, TNO, NIOSH, Technical University of Denmark, Kent state, Harvard, Washington) in particular on respiratory protective devices, hearing protectors, safety footwear, gloves, protective clothing, kneepads, eye protectors. They sometimes have shown very big differences between the theoretical performances evaluated in laboratories and in real condition of use.

“PPE having satisfied all the tests in the laboratory can sometimes appear in real conditions of use, less efficient and comfortable than expected”

?D in dB According to Frequencies (Hz)
earing Protectors 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 ?d
Ear-plugs A -7.5 -3.4 -3.1 -8.0 -7.4 -5.9
Ear-plugs B -7.5 -1.1 -8.1 -11.7 -15.2 -8.7
Ear-plugs C -21.0 -14.4 -6.5 -9.4 -15.2 -13.3
Ear-plugs D -12.0 -6.3 -5.9 -9.7 -12.6 -9.3
Ear-muffs E -5.6 -2.7 -6.8 -4.3 -4.7 -4.8
Ear-muffs F -2.5 -6.1 -4.1 -1.5 -9.4 -2.3
Ear-muffs G +0.5 -4.3 -7.7 -11.5 -5.5 -5.7
Ear-muffs H -11.9 -6.5 -4.0 -0.2 -3.6 -5.2
Ear-muffs I -4.9 -1.9 -5.7 -4.4 -5.8 -4.5

Note: ?d is the arithmetical mean value according to frequency (Hz)

Typical example of hearing protective devices

The noise attenuation of hearing protectors is evaluated in Europe, according to the standard EN24869-1: 1993 on the basis of measurement conducted with 16 test subjects 1 . They shall be preliminary trained in the wearing of the protective device and its adjustment. They shall be also familiar with audiometry and their audiogram must be repeatable (less than 6dB of variation).

In practice, the workers are not always well informed about how to adjust the hearing protection device. Even when they are informed, the fitting of the protective device, in particular of ear-plugs, tends to evolve, to move, resulting in a lesser degree of tightness, therefore a decrease in the protection performance. Regarding this matter, it is worth noting that it is not always easy to re-adjust the ear-plug if he/she perceives that the ear-plug is less tight than it ought to be due to bad adjustment.

That is the reason why attenuation values found at work places and with untrained subjects, reported for many years in various publications are appreciably lower than those measured in laboratories 6-19 .

To illustrate the importance of these discrepancies and the need to not sacrifice the estimated protection of the users, only for the sake of simplicity and of economical aspects I would like to give these three typical examples of study results.

  • A study (PFEIFFER, 1989) on noise attenuation characteristics of hearing protectors was carried out by BGIA in Germany in a series of enterprises of different industrial sectors. The results (Table 1) show that the effective attenuation values for ear-plugs were distinctly below what could be expected according to the type test in laboratory 6 . Mean differences come up to 13.3 dB for foam plugs and 5.9 to 8.7 dB for fibreglass wool. It would be possible to considerably decrease these differences if the workers were instructed on how to correctly use the ear- plugs and how to survey their own wearing behaviour. With a mean value of 4.5 dB differences for ear-muffs are distinctly smaller. Control measurements of already worn and new ear-muffs prove decreased protective efficiently to be mainly a consequence of ageing and wear. This could be avoided by guaranteeing regular maintenance (situation of cushions and liners) and limit the usable life
  • A bibliographical study published by NIOSH in 1998, shows similar differences7. The summing up of the results, that is detailed in the NIOSH report are given in the table 2. They correspond to 20 independent studies carried out by 7 different countries with 2,900 subjects on 30 different models of HPD in two different testing conditions: real working-world and with trained subjects in laboratory in accordance with the old standards ANSI S12.6-1984 and 1974. The biggest differences can be observed with fibreglass and premoulded ear-plugs where the effective attenuation is respectively 70% and 84% lower than the one evaluated in laboratory with trained subjects. These results demonstrated that relying on the manufacturer’s instructions based on not enough realistic methods of measurement may be of little value in estimating the effective protection a worker obtains under conditions of real use
  • The last example is a similar bibliographical investigation carried out by INRS on 6 other studies 8-13 that shows also big differences between laboratory and near real-world measurements: 13.1 to 17.5 dB for ear-plugs and 6.5 to 7.4 dB for ear-muffs (Table 3)

“Even when they are informed, the fitting of  ear-plugs, tends to evolve, resulting in a lesser degree of tightness, therefore a decrease in the protection performance”

Noise Attenuation on dB
Type of HPD Number of Models Number of Studies Real protection afforded to 84% of individuals Ratio = Value declared by manufacturer value
Foam ear-plug 1 15 0.49
Fibreglass ear-plug 3 10 0.26 −0.36 −0.19
Premoulded ear-plug 4 16 0.33 −0.08 −0.19 −0.007
Custom made ear-plug 3 7 0.16 −0.73 −0.33
Ear-muff 15 18 0.64 −0.35 −0.63 −0.28 −0.65 −0.47 −0.54 −1.04 −0.8 −0.75
Helmut mounted ear-muff 15 18 0.69 −0.47 −0.54 −0.66 −0.74
Ear-plug + ear-muff 1 1 0.86

The consequences for the HPD selection

Hearing protectors shall attenuate noise sufficiently to keep the worker’s “real-world” exposure (i.e., the noise exposure at the worker’s ear when hearing protectors are worn) below 85 dBA (in the USA according to OSHA regulations 29CFR1910.95) or 87dBA (in the EU according to Directive 2003/10/EC) over an 8-hour workday.

Type of hearing protective devices (number of data) Attenuation H M L SNR
ISO 4869−2 Real world ISO 4869−2 Real world ISO 4869−2 Real world ISO 4869−2 Real world
Ear-plugs user-moulded (10) Mean value 33.4 20.3 29.0 14.1 26.7 11.6 32.2 17.9
Ear-plugs pre-moulded (8) Mean value 33.4 15.9 28.3 11.3 25.8 9.8 31.8 14.8
Ear-muffs (8) Mean value 35.9 27.3 26.9 19.8 18.6 12.1 29.8 22.4

H, M, L, SNR = Attenuation values as defined in ISO 4869-2

Two ways are possible to generate valid reference attenuation data for the proper selection of HPD that could be considered to be acceptable for use in workplaces regarding the noise exposition conditions and the lawful requirements:

  • Modification of the measurement procedure in particular by using test subjects who are inexperienced in the fitting and use of hearing protectors. These measurement conditions are recognised as providing results that are representative for noise reduction obtained by group of typical users in real-world occupational settings 20 . This way of solution has been adopted since 1997 in the USA (ANSI S 12.6- 1997), 1998 in Australia and New Zealand (AS/NZS1269: 1998, 1270:1999 and 1270:2002) and more recently by ISO (ISO/TS 4869-5:2006) 1-5 . Moreover, interlaboratory reproducibility was found to be best for this “subject-fit” method in comparison with the old experimenter-fit and informed-user-fit methods 21 or at least equivalent
  • Application of derating factors to the results obtained with trained individuals. The conclusions of studies recommend significant corrections to the performances claimed by the manufacturers. OSHA: 1983 has instructed its compliance officers to derate the NRR (Noise Reduction Rate) by 50% in enforcing the engineering control provision of the OSHA noise standard. However, NIOSH on the basis of the study presented above, has recommended, if more realistic data is not available, to derate hearing protectors NRR by a factor that corresponds to the available real-world data: a. Ear-muffs: Subtract 25% from the manufacturer’s labelled NRR b. Slow-recovery formable ear-plugs: Subtract 50% from the manufacturer’s labelled NRR c. All other ear-plugs: Subtract 70% from the manufacturer’s labelled NRR In France corrections are also proposed: – 5 decibels for ear-muffs and custom moulded ear-plugs, -10 decibels for formable ear plugs and – 7 decibels for helmut mounted ear-muffs. Different derating factors are proposed by EU member states such as Germany, UK and Spain

This problem has been officially submitted for consideration to the EU Commission by the French Ministry of Labor to harmonise the national approaches and to request the revision of the existing EN ISO 4869-2 standard.

Conclusion

The example of the overestimated noise reduction of hearing protectors, which is only one typical case among others in the PPE field, shows the crucial importance of having reliable test methods to assess the real protective characteristics of the PPE. Before introducing or confirming a test method in a standard, CEN Technical committee on PPE are now officially encouraged to validate when possible its representativeness 23 . This is of particular importance for test methods related to key health and safety characteristics. The results of these studies suggest also to pay more attention to the proper selection of PPE, on the necessary preliminary information and training of the workers on the wearing and on the use of PPE.

For more information on hearing protection, please visit the ose.directory

Published: 10th Apr 2008 in Health and Safety International

Share this article

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Alain Mayer

Connect with Alain Mayer

Visit Website

POPULAR POSTS BY Alain Mayer

Istock 508121319 0 202 2172 3863 - hsi -

Article

Eye Protection in Relation to Directive 89/656/EEC

Istock 588983482 0 255 2752 4883 - hsi -

Article

Hearing Protectors

Istock 665483294 0 110 1193 2121 - hsi -

Article

Prevention of Electrostatic Risks

Get email updates

Sign up for the HSI newsletter

Keep up-to-date through the power of email with Europe's largest audited safety magazine - delivering the latest news and products to satisfy all your occupational safety needs.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

FEATURED ARTICLES

Article

 Thameslink Traffic Management Programme

Press Release

‘Working At Height’ Remains Biggest Danger

Press Release

“Uncertainty and Ignorance” Risks More Asbestos Deaths

Advertisement

SOCIAL MEDIA

HSI on Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/HSIMagazine/

Advertisement

SOCIAL MEDIA

HSI on Twitter

hsimagazine HSI Magazine @hsimagazine ·
29 Mar

Accidents in the workplace can happen at any time. While the consequences and outcomes of these incidents are fairly straightforward to see, establishing who is liable for accidents can be a little more challenging.
https://www.hsimagazine.com/press-release/accidents-in-the-workplace-who-is-responsible/

#hsimagazine #workplacesafety

Reply on Twitter 1641038324226818048 Retweet on Twitter 1641038324226818048 Like on Twitter 1641038324226818048 1 Twitter 1641038324226818048

Advertisement

SUBSCRIBE

Stay up to date with our newsletter

    • Keep up-to-date with Europe’s largest audited safety magazine

 

    • Delivering the latest news and products to satisfy all your occupational safety needs

 

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Subscribe

SUBSCRIBE TO HSI MAGAZINE

5 reasons to subscribe to our digital and print package

  • Stay up to date from anywhere in the world, with instant access to the latest issue straight from your phone, tablet or laptop.
  • Trust that you’re getting the best content from our range of internationally accredited authors.
  • Get full access to our archives and see how occupational safety has evolved with us over the years.
  • Enjoy our monthly newsletter curated with up-to-the-minute news and a selection of editor’s top picks.
  • Hot off the press and straight to your door – look forward to your own glossy copy of HSI, delivered five times a year
Subscribe View Subscription levels

STAY SAFE & INFORMED

Subscribe to the best health & safety articles, news, products and regulations

Find out more

Stay up to date with our newsletter

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

ABOUT

  • About HSI International
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

YOUR ACCOUNT

Sign In Register Account Subscribe to HSI

RESOURCES

Request Media Pack

CONNECT

ACCREDITATIONS

Copyright Bay Publishing 2023. All Rights reserved.

Designed & Built by:
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT